Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Microb Genom ; 9(9)2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37672388

ABSTRACT

For the last two decades, the human infection frequency of Escherichia coli O157 (O157) in Scotland has been 2.5-fold higher than in England and Wales. Results from national cattle surveys conducted in Scotland and England and Wales in 2014/2015 were combined with data on reported human clinical cases from the same time frame to determine if strain differences in national populations of O157 in cattle could be associated with higher human infection rates in Scotland. Shiga toxin subtype (Stx) and phage type (PT) were examined within and between host (cattle vs human) and nation (Scotland vs England and Wales). For a subset of the strains, whole genome sequencing (WGS) provided further insights into geographical and host association. All three major O157 lineages (I, II, I/II) and most sub-lineages (Ia, Ib, Ic, IIa, IIb, IIc) were represented in cattle and humans in both nations. While the relative contribution of different reservoir hosts to human infection is unknown, WGS analysis indicated that the majority of O157 diversity in human cases was captured by isolates from cattle. Despite comparable cattle O157 prevalence between nations, strain types were localized. PT21/28 (sub-lineage Ic, Stx2a+) was significantly more prevalent in Scottish cattle [odds ratio (OR) 8.7 (2.3-33.7; P<0.001] and humans [OR 2.2 (1.5-3.2); P<0.001]. In England and Wales, cattle had a significantly higher association with sub-lineage IIa strains [PT54, Stx2c; OR 5.6 (1.27-33.3); P=0.011] while humans were significantly more closely associated with sub-lineage IIb [PT8, Stx1 and Stx2c; OR 29 (4.9-1161); P<0.001]. Therefore, cattle farms in Scotland were more likely to harbour Stx2a+O157 strains compared to farms in E and W (P<0.001). There was evidence of limited cattle strain migration between nations and clinical isolates from one nation were more similar to cattle isolates from the same nation, with sub-lineage Ic (mainly PT21/28) exhibiting clear national association and evidence of local transmission in Scotland. While we propose the higher rate of O157 clinical cases in Scotland, compared to England and Wales, is a consequence of the nationally higher level of Stx2a+O157 strains in Scottish cattle, we discuss the multiple additional factors that may also contribute to the different infection rates between these nations.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli O157 , Humans , Cattle , Animals , Escherichia coli O157/genetics , Wales/epidemiology , Scotland/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Farms
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 11735, 2022 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35853960

ABSTRACT

Whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has occurred at an unprecedented scale, and can be exploited for characterising outbreak risks at the fine-scale needed to inform control strategies. One setting at continued risk of COVID-19 outbreaks are higher education institutions, associated with student movements at the start of term, close living conditions within residential halls, and high social contact rates. Here we analysed SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequences in combination with epidemiological data to investigate a large cluster of student cases associated with University of Glasgow accommodation in autumn 2020, Scotland. We identified 519 student cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with this large cluster through contact tracing data, with 30% sequencing coverage for further analysis. We estimated at least 11 independent introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into the student population, with four comprising the majority of detected cases and consistent with separate outbreaks. These four outbreaks were curtailed within a week following implementation of control measures. The impact of student infections on the local community was short-term despite an underlying increase in community infections. Our study highlights the need for context-specific information in the formation of public health policy for higher educational settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Genomics , Health Planning , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , United States , Universities
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36589877

ABSTRACT

The flagellated pathogen Giardia duodenalis is one of the leading causes of parasitic gastrointestinal illness worldwide. In many higher income countries, such as the United Kingdom, the disease is often perceived as being travel-related, likely leading to the under-reporting of sporadic cases and outbreaks. A summary of the literature describing outbreaks and risk factors in higher income countries is necessary to improve our understanding of this pathogen and identify existing knowledge gaps. Initial literature searches were carried out in September 2016 and updated at regular intervals until November 2021, using appropriate search terms in Medline, Embase and PubMed databases. A total of 75 papers met the inclusion criteria, revealing that the consumption of contaminated water and contact with young children of diaper-wearing age were the most common transmission routes leading to outbreaks of giardiasis. Of the ten studies where food was primarily associated with outbreaks, food handlers accounted for eight of these. Another reported transmission route was direct contact with fecal material, which was reported in six studies as the primary transmission route. Travel-associated giardiasis was considered the sole transmission route in two studies, whereas multiple transmission routes contributed to giardiasis outbreaks in eleven studies. The evidence around zoonotic transmission was less clear and hampered by the lack of robust and regularly applied parasite molecular typing techniques. This literature review summarizes the findings of Giardia outbreak investigations and epidemiological studies in high-income countries. Transmission routes are identified and discussed to highlight the associated risk factors. These data also indicate gaps in our current knowledge that include the need for robust, in-depth molecular studies and have underscored the importance of water as a transmission route for Giardia cysts. These future molecular studies will improve our understanding of Giardia epidemiology and transmission pathways in higher income countries to prevent spread of this significantly under-reported pathogen.

4.
J Med Microbiol ; 70(12)2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919511

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a zoonotic, foodborne gastrointestinal pathogen that has the potential to cause severe clinical outcomes, including haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). STEC-HUS is the leading cause of renal failure in children and can be fatal. Over the last decade, STEC clonal complex 165 (CC165) has emerged as a cause of STEC-HUS.Gap Statement. There is a need to understand the pathogenicity and prevalence of this emerging STEC clonal complex in the UK, to facilitate early diagnosis, improve clinical management, and prevent and control outbreaks.Aim. The aim of this study was to characterize CC165 through identification of virulence factors (VFs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants in the genome and to integrate the genome data with the available epidemiological data to better understand the incidence and pathogenicity of this clonal complex in the UK.Methodology. All isolates belonging to CC165 in the archives at the UK public health agencies were sequenced and serotyped, and the virulence gene and AMR profiles were derived from the genome using PHE bioinformatics pipelines and the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology virulence database.Results. There were 48 CC165 isolates, of which 43 were STEC, four were enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and one E. coli. STEC serotypes were predominately O80:H2 (n=28), and other serotypes included O45:H2 (n=9), O55:H9 (n=4), O132:H2 (n=1) and O180:H2 (n=1). All but one STEC isolate had Shiga toxin (stx) subtype stx2a or stx2d and 47/48 isolates had the eae gene encoding intimin involved in the intimate attachment of the bacteria to the human gut mucosa. We detected extra-intestinal virulence genes including those associated with iron acquisition (iro) and serum resistance (iss), indicating that this pathogen has the potential to translocate to extra-intestinal sites. Unlike other STEC clonal complexes, a high proportion of isolates (93%, 40/43) were multidrug-resistant, including resistance to aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, chloramphenicol, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and trimethoprim.Conclusion. The clinical significance of this clonal complex should not be underestimated. Exhibiting high levels of AMR and a combination of STEC and extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) virulence profiles, this clonal complex is an emerging threat to public health.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Genomics , Humans , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Virulence/genetics , Virulence Factors/genetics
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e178, 2021 08 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34635196

ABSTRACT

In October 2019, public health surveillance systems in Scotland identified an increase in the number of reported infections of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26:H11 involving bloody diarrhoea. Ultimately, across the United Kingdom (UK) 32 cases of STEC O26:H11 stx1a were identified, with the median age of 27 years and 64% were male; six cases were hospitalised. Among food exposures there was an association with consuming pre-packed sandwiches purchased at outlets belonging to a national food chain franchise (food outlet A) [odds ratio (OR) = 183.89, P < 0.001]. The common ingredient identified as a component of the majority of the sandwiches sold at food outlet A was a mixed salad of Apollo and Iceberg lettuce and spinach leaves. Microbiological testing of food and environmental samples were negative for STEC O26:H11, although STEC O36:H19 was isolated from a mixed salad sample taken from premises owned by food outlet A. Contamination of fresh produce is often due to a transient event and detection of the aetiological agent in food that has a short-shelf life is challenging. Robust, statistically significant epidemiological analysis should be sufficient evidence to direct timely and targeted on-farm investigations. A shift in focus from testing the microbiological quality of the produce to investigating the processes and practices through the supply chain and sampling the farm environment is recommended.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Fast Foods/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Adult , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Fast Foods/poisoning , Fast Foods/supply & distribution , Female , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , Humans , Male , Salads/microbiology , Salads/poisoning , Salads/supply & distribution , Serogroup , Shiga Toxin/genetics , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 1: 100005, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to significant respiratory failure with between 14% and 18% of hospitalised patients requiring critical care admission. This study describes the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on 30-day survival following critical care admission for COVID-19, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care capacity in Scotland. METHODS: This cohort study used linked national hospital records including ICU, virology testing and national death records to identify and describe patients with COVID-19 admitted to critical care units in Scotland. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the impact of deprivation on 30-day mortality. Critical care capacity was described by reporting the percentage of baseline ICU bed utilisation required. FINDINGS: There were 735 patients with COVID-19 admitted to critical care units across Scotland from 1/3/2020 to 20/6/2020. There was a higher proportion of patients from more deprived areas, with 183 admissions (24.9%) from the most deprived quintile and 100 (13.6%) from the least deprived quintile. Overall, 30-day mortality was 34.8%. After adjusting for age, sex and ethnicity, mortality was significantly higher in patients from the most deprived quintile (OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.13, 3.41, p=0.016). ICUs serving populations with higher levels of deprivation spent a greater amount of time over their baseline ICU bed capacity. INTERPRETATION: Patients with COVID-19 living in areas with greatest socioeconomic deprivation had a higher frequency of critical care admission and a higher adjusted 30-day mortality. ICUs in health boards with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation had both higher peak occupancy and longer duration of occupancy over normal maximum capacity. FUNDING: None.

7.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e147, 2021 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096488

ABSTRACT

In August 2019, public health surveillance systems in Scotland and England identified seven, geographically dispersed cases infected with the same strain (defined as isolates that fell within the same five single nucleotide polymorphism single linage cluster) of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7. Epidemiological analysis of enhanced surveillance questionnaire data identified handling raw beef and shopping from the same national retailer (retailer A) as the common exposure. Concurrently, a microbiological survey of minced beef at retail identified the same strain in a sample of minced beef sold by retailer A, providing microbiological evidence of the link. Between September and November 2019, a further four primary and two secondary cases infected with the same strain were identified; two cases developed haemolytic uraemic syndrome. None of the four primary cases reported consumption of beef from retailer A and the transmission route of these subsequent cases was not identified, although all four primary cases visited the same petting farm. Generally, outbreaks of STEC O157:H7 in the UK appear to be distinct, short-lived events; however, on-going transmission linked to contaminated food, animals or environmental exposures and person-to-person contact do occur. Although outbreaks of STEC caused by contaminated fresh produce are increasingly common, undercooked meat products remain a risk of infection.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/transmission , Escherichia coli O157/isolation & purification , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cattle , Child , Child, Preschool , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , England/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli O157/classification , Escherichia coli O157/genetics , Female , Food Microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Epidemiology , Phylogeny , Red Meat/microbiology , Scotland/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Arch Dis Child ; 106(12): 1207-1210, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33985959

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology, age at infection, clinical characteristics and outcome of listeria infection in young infants to inform management and empiric antibiotic choice in young infants. DESIGN: Prospective 2-year surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes infection in young infants detected through the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit 'orange card' system and triangulated with the public health laboratories. SETTING: National population study (England, Wales, Scotland and the Ireland) PATIENTS: All infants under 90 days with proven or probable invasive listeriosis MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, mortality, age of infection, clinical characteristics and outcome RESULTS: During a 2-year period (2017-2019), 27 cases of listeriosis in infants <90 days of age were reported. The incidence of listeriosis in this study was 1.8 per 100 000 live births with 7% mortality (2/27). Nearly all cases presented within the first 24 hours of life (26/27). The majority (20/27, 74%) were born preterm and 16/24 (67%) were born to women from ethnic minority backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive listeriosis in young infants in the UK and Ireland is rare and presents early in the neonatal period. National guidelines that recommend the use of amoxicillin as part of empiric regimes for sepsis and meningitis in infants over 1 month of age should be modified.


Subject(s)
Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/diagnosis , Population Surveillance/methods , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Ireland/epidemiology , Leukocytosis/cerebrospinal fluid , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology
9.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 51, 2021 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33612113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the relation of severe COVID-19 to prior drug prescribing. METHODS: Severe cases were defined by entry to critical care or fatal outcome. For this matched case-control study (REACT-SCOT), all 4251 cases of severe COVID-19 in Scotland since the start of the epidemic were matched for age, sex and primary care practice to 36,738 controls from the population register. Records were linked to hospital discharges since June 2015 and dispensed prescriptions issued in primary care during the last 240 days. RESULTS: Severe COVID-19 was strongly associated with the number of non-cardiovascular drug classes dispensed. This association was strongest in those not resident in a care home, in whom the rate ratio (95% CI) associated with dispensing of 12 or more drug classes versus none was 10.8 (8.8, 13.3), and in those without any of the conditions designated as conferring increased risk of COVID-19. Of 17 drug classes postulated at the start of the epidemic to be "medications compromising COVID", all were associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 and these associations were present in those without any of the designated risk conditions. The fraction of cases in the population attributable to exposure to these drug classes was 38%. The largest effect was for antipsychotic agents: rate ratio 4.18 (3.42, 5.11). Other drug classes with large effects included proton pump inhibitors (rate ratio 2.20 (1.72, 2.83) for = 2 defined daily doses/day), opioids (3.66 (2.68, 5.01) for = 50 mg morphine equivalent/day) and gabapentinoids. These associations persisted after adjusting for covariates and were stronger with recent than with non-recent exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Severe COVID-19 is associated with polypharmacy and with drugs that cause sedation, respiratory depression, or dyskinesia; have anticholinergic effects; or affect the gastrointestinal system. These associations are not easily explained by co-morbidity. Measures to reduce the burden of mortality and morbidity from COVID-19 should include reinforcing existing guidance on reducing overprescribing of these drug classes and limiting inappropriate polypharmacy. REGISTRATION: ENCEPP number EUPAS35558.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Care/trends , Polypharmacy , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/chemically induced , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Prescriptions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Scotland/epidemiology
10.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol ; 9(2): 82-93, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33357491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to ascertain the cumulative risk of fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 in people with diabetes and compare it with that of people without diabetes, and to investigate risk factors for and build a cross-validated predictive model of fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 among people with diabetes. METHODS: In this cohort study, we captured the data encompassing the first wave of the pandemic in Scotland, from March 1, 2020, when the first case was identified, to July 31, 2020, when infection rates had dropped sufficiently that shielding measures were officially terminated. The participants were the total population of Scotland, including all people with diabetes who were alive 3 weeks before the start of the pandemic in Scotland (estimated Feb 7, 2020). We ascertained how many people developed fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 in this period from the Electronic Communication of Surveillance in Scotland database (on virology), the RAPID database of daily hospitalisations, the Scottish Morbidity Records-01 of hospital discharges, the National Records of Scotland death registrations data, and the Scottish Intensive Care Society and Audit Group database (on critical care). Among people with fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19, diabetes status was ascertained by linkage to the national diabetes register, Scottish Care Information Diabetes. We compared the cumulative incidence of fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 in people with and without diabetes using logistic regression. For people with diabetes, we obtained data on potential risk factors for fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 from the national diabetes register and other linked health administrative databases. We tested the association of these factors with fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 in people with diabetes, and constructed a prediction model using stepwise regression and 20-fold cross-validation. FINDINGS: Of the total Scottish population on March 1, 2020 (n=5 463 300), the population with diabetes was 319 349 (5·8%), 1082 (0·3%) of whom developed fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 by July 31, 2020, of whom 972 (89·8%) were aged 60 years or older. In the population without diabetes, 4081 (0·1%) of 5 143 951 people developed fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19. As of July 31, the overall odds ratio (OR) for diabetes, adjusted for age and sex, was 1·395 (95% CI 1·304-1·494; p<0·0001, compared with the risk in those without diabetes. The OR was 2·396 (1·815-3·163; p<0·0001) in type 1 diabetes and 1·369 (1·276-1·468; p<0·0001) in type 2 diabetes. Among people with diabetes, adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes duration and type, those who developed fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 were more likely to be male, live in residential care or a more deprived area, have a COVID-19 risk condition, retinopathy, reduced renal function, or worse glycaemic control, have had a diabetic ketoacidosis or hypoglycaemia hospitalisation in the past 5 years, be on more anti-diabetic and other medication (all p<0·0001), and have been a smoker (p=0·0011). The cross-validated predictive model of fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 in people with diabetes had a C-statistic of 0·85 (0·83-0·86). INTERPRETATION: Overall risks of fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19 were substantially elevated in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared with the background population. The risk of fatal or critical care unit-treated COVID-19, and therefore the need for special protective measures, varies widely among those with diabetes but can be predicted reasonably well using previous clinical history. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Population Surveillance , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Critical Care/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Scotland/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
PLoS Med ; 17(10): e1003374, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33079969

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to identify risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to lay the basis for risk stratification based on demographic data and health records. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The design was a matched case-control study. Severe COVID-19 was defined as either a positive nucleic acid test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the national database followed by entry to a critical care unit or death within 28 days or a death certificate with COVID-19 as underlying cause. Up to 10 controls per case matched for sex, age, and primary care practice were selected from the national population register. For this analysis-based on ascertainment of positive test results up to 6 June 2020, entry to critical care up to 14 June 2020, and deaths registered up to 14 June 2020-there were 36,948 controls and 4,272 cases, of which 1,894 (44%) were care home residents. All diagnostic codes from the past 5 years of hospitalisation records and all drug codes from prescriptions dispensed during the past 240 days were extracted. Rate ratios for severe COVID-19 were estimated by conditional logistic regression. In a logistic regression using the age-sex distribution of the national population, the odds ratios for severe disease were 2.87 for a 10-year increase in age and 1.63 for male sex. In the case-control analysis, the strongest risk factor was residence in a care home, with rate ratio 21.4 (95% CI 19.1-23.9, p = 8 × 10-644). Univariate rate ratios for conditions listed by public health agencies as conferring high risk were 2.75 (95% CI 1.96-3.88, p = 6 × 10-9) for type 1 diabetes, 1.60 (95% CI 1.48-1.74, p = 8 × 10-30) for type 2 diabetes, 1.49 (95% CI 1.37-1.61, p = 3 × 10-21) for ischemic heart disease, 2.23 (95% CI 2.08-2.39, p = 4 × 10-109) for other heart disease, 1.96 (95% CI 1.83-2.10, p = 2 × 10-78) for chronic lower respiratory tract disease, 4.06 (95% CI 3.15-5.23, p = 3 × 10-27) for chronic kidney disease, 5.4 (95% CI 4.9-5.8, p = 1 × 10-354) for neurological disease, 3.61 (95% CI 2.60-5.00, p = 2 × 10-14) for chronic liver disease, and 2.66 (95% CI 1.86-3.79, p = 7 × 10-8) for immune deficiency or suppression. Seventy-eight percent of cases and 52% of controls had at least one listed condition (51% of cases and 11% of controls under age 40). Severe disease was associated with encashment of at least one prescription in the past 9 months and with at least one hospital admission in the past 5 years (rate ratios 3.10 [95% CI 2.59-3.71] and 2.75 [95% CI 2.53-2.99], respectively) even after adjusting for the listed conditions. In those without listed conditions, significant associations with severe disease were seen across many hospital diagnoses and drug categories. Age and sex provided 2.58 bits of information for discrimination. A model based on demographic variables, listed conditions, hospital diagnoses, and prescriptions provided an additional 1.07 bits (C-statistic 0.804). A limitation of this study is that records from primary care were not available. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that, along with older age and male sex, severe COVID-19 is strongly associated with past medical history across all age groups. Many comorbidities beyond the risk conditions designated by public health agencies contribute to this. A risk classifier that uses all the information available in health records, rather than only a limited set of conditions, will more accurately discriminate between low-risk and high-risk individuals who may require shielding until the epidemic is over.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Status , Hospitalization , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Therapy , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Scotland/epidemiology , Young Adult
12.
BMJ ; 371: m3582, 2020 10 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33115726

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of hospital admission for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) among patient facing and non-patient facing healthcare workers and their household members. DESIGN: Nationwide linkage cohort study. SETTING: Scotland, UK, 1 March to 6 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers aged 18-65 years, their households, and other members of the general population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Admission to hospital with covid-19. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 158 445 healthcare workers, most of them (90 733; 57.3%) being patient facing, and 229 905 household members. Of all hospital admissions for covid-19 in the working age population (18-65 year olds), 17.2% (360/2097) were in healthcare workers or their households. After adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbidity, the risk of admission due to covid-19 in non-patient facing healthcare workers and their households was similar to the risk in the general population (hazard ratio 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.52 to 1.26) and 0.86 (0.49 to 1.51), respectively). In models adjusting for the same covariates, however, patient facing healthcare workers, compared with non-patient facing healthcare workers, were at higher risk (hazard ratio 3.30, 2.13 to 5.13), as were household members of patient facing healthcare workers (1.79, 1.10 to 2.91). After sub-division of patient facing healthcare workers into those who worked in "front door," intensive care, and non-intensive care aerosol generating settings and other, those in front door roles were at higher risk (hazard ratio 2.09, 1.49 to 2.94). For most patient facing healthcare workers and their households, the estimated absolute risk of hospital admission with covid-19 was less than 0.5%, but it was 1% and above in older men with comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers and their households contributed a sixth of covid-19 cases admitted to hospital. Although the absolute risk of admission was low overall, patient facing healthcare workers and their household members had threefold and twofold increased risks of admission with covid-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Family , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Health Personnel/classification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Scotland/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
Parasit Vectors ; 13(1): 291, 2020 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Giardia duodenalis is one of the most common parasites in the UK to cause diarrhoeal illness. Giardiasis is likely to be significantly under-reported in the UK as laboratory testing is largely based on examining stool samples from individuals with a recent travel history. This results in the majority of locally-acquired cases going undetected. To increase awareness of giardiasis, we describe data gathered from cases reported within Scotland during 2011-2018. METHODS: All of the 21 Scottish National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic microbiology laboratories performed microscopy examination to detect Giardia cysts in stools, from mostly travel-related cases. The exception was one laboratory that implemented an antigen-based enzyme immunoassay in 2015. This resulted in every submitted stool being tested for Giardia. Laboratory-confirmed cases of giardiasis were reported to Health Protection Scotland (HPS) via the Electronic Communication of Surveillance in Scotland (ECOSS) during the eight-year period. Data for calculating the incidence per 100,000 of the population were obtained from the National Records of Scotland mid-2018 population estimates in Scotland. RESULTS: A total of 1631 Scottish cases were reported during 2011-2018 (8-year mean: 204; range: 166-269). National Health Service Grampian, Borders and Lothian reported the highest incidence of Giardia (9.8, 7.5 and 6.7 per 100,000, respectively), all of which were above the Scottish mean incidence (3.8 per 100,000). Following the implementation of antigen testing in NHS Grampian during 2015, reports significantly increased 3.6-fold (P = 0.005). The highest incidence of giardiasis occurred in the 20-49 years age group (mean 5.4 per 100,000). Of interest, the mean incidence of giardiasis was significantly higher in males than in females (4.8 versus 3.1 per 100,000, respectively; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the need to capture enhanced information on every laboratory-confirmed case of giardiasis to gain a better understanding of the local sources and transmission pathways occurring in Scotland. In addition, implementing sensitive, automated technologies across UK NHS diagnostic microbiology laboratories to permit the efficient, routine testing of every submitted stool for Giardia, should be encouraged to ensure all cases are identified and treated appropriately.


Subject(s)
Epidemiological Monitoring , Feces/parasitology , Giardiasis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Diarrhea/parasitology , Disease Reservoirs/parasitology , Female , Giardiasis/diagnosis , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Scotland/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Young Adult
14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 847, 2019 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Salmonella outbreaks in childcare facilities are relatively rare, most often occurring secondary to contaminated food products or poor infection control practices. We report an outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul at a pre-school facility in Ayrshire, Scotland with atypical clinical and epidemiological features. METHODS: Following notification of the initial two cases, the multi-disciplinary Incident Management Team initiated enhanced active case finding and two environmental inspections of the site, including food preparation areas. Parent and staff interviews were conducted by the Public Health department covering attendance, symptomatology and risk factors for all probable and confirmed cases. Microbiological testing of stool samples and the facility water tank was conducted. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) was performed for positive stool samples at the national reference laboratory. Infection control measures were introduced iteratively due to the atypical progression of the outbreak. RESULTS: There were 15 confirmed cases and 3 children admitted to hospital during the outbreak. However, 35.7% of cases reported extremely mild symptoms. The attack rate was 15.2%, and age of affected children ranged from 18 to 58 months (mean 35 months). All cases were the same Multilocus Sequence Type (MLST50). Epidemiological investigation strongly suggested person-to-person spread within the facility. Existing infection control practices were found to be of a high standard, but introduction of additional evidence-based control measures was inadequate in halting transmission. Facility staff reported concerns about lack of parental disclosure of gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly where these were mild, with 50.0% of cases having attended while symptomatic against public health advice. Voluntary two-week closure of the facility was implemented to halt transmission, following which there were no new cases. WGS results were unavailable until after the decision was taken to close the facility. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported instance of a Salmonella Saintpaul outbreak at a childcare facility, or where person-to-person transmission is indicated. Clinicians should consider the influence of parental under-reporting on gastrointestinal outbreaks in childcare settings, particularly where perceived severity is low and financial or social pressures to attend work may reduce compliance. WGS cannot yet replace conventional microbiological techniques during short, localised outbreaks due to delays receiving results.


Subject(s)
Salmonella Infections/diagnosis , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Child Day Care Centers , Child, Preschool , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Public Health , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Scotland/epidemiology , Whole Genome Sequencing
15.
J Clin Virol ; 115: 1-4, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of cases of acute hepatitis A reported in Scotland each year is small, and the majority of cases have been associated with travel to endemic regions. However, in early 2017, in the midst of ongoing outbreaks of hepatitis A among MSM in Europe, there was a sharp rise in the number of cases reported to Health Protection Scotland. OBJECTIVES: The initial aim of this study was to investigate the reason for the observed increase in cases of hepatitis A at the start of 2017. As cases continued for the remainder of the year, these cases were typed to determine whether these cases were linked to each other, or other outbreaks. STUDY DESIGN: The study population consisted of 42 hepatitis A infected patients with no obvious source of infection. The patient samples were collected between January and December 2017. The VP1/2 A region was amplified and sequenced. RESULTS: The majority of samples typed as genotype 1 A (n = 17) or genotype 1B (n = 15). Within genotype 1 A, fifteen samples had strains (VRD_521_2016 or RIVM_HAV16_090) associated with ongoing outbreaks of hepatitis A in MSM in Europe. Within genotype 1B, there were four clusters of infections, with identical cases in geographically distinct regions with no identified epidemiological link. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular typing proved useful, as it allowed public health to identify clusters, establish links with other outbreaks and compare Scottish strains with those reported elsewhere.


Subject(s)
Genotype , Hepatitis A virus/genetics , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Acute Disease/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Hepatitis A/virology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phylogeny , RNA, Viral/genetics , Risk Factors , Scotland/epidemiology , Viral Structural Proteins/genetics , Young Adult
16.
Euro Surveill ; 23(33)2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131095

ABSTRACT

Between 1 June 2016 and 31 May 2017, 17 European Union (EU) and European Economic Area countries reported 4,096 cases associated with a multi-country hepatitis A (HA) outbreak. Molecular analysis identified three co-circulating hepatitis A virus (HAV) strains of genotype IA: VRD_521_2016, V16-25801 and RIVM-HAV16-090. We categorised cases as confirmed, probable or possible, according to the EU outbreak case definitions. Confirmed cases were infected with one of the three outbreak strains. We investigated case characteristics and strain-specific risk factors for transmission. A total of 1,400 (34%) cases were confirmed; VRD_521_2016 and RIVM-HAV16-090 accounted for 92% of these. Among confirmed cases with available epidemiological data, 92% (361/393) were unvaccinated, 43% (83/195) travelled to Spain during the incubation period and 84% (565/676) identified as men who have sex with men (MSM). Results depict an HA outbreak of multiple HAV strains, within a cross-European population, that was particularly driven by transmission between non-immune MSM engaging in high-risk sexual behaviour. The most effective preventive measure to curb this outbreak is HAV vaccination of MSM, supplemented by primary prevention campaigns that target the MSM population and promote protective sexual behaviour.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Hepatitis A virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe/epidemiology , European Union , Genotype , Hepatitis A/diagnosis , Hepatitis A virus/genetics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sexual Behavior , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
17.
Euro Surveill ; 23(12)2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29589577

ABSTRACT

BackgroundPrevious studies showed low levels of circulating hepatitis E virus (HEV) in Scotland. We aimed to reassess current Scottish HEV epidemiology. Methods: Blood donor samples from five Scottish blood centres, the minipools for routine HEV screening and liver transplant recipients were tested for HEV antibodies and RNA to determine seroprevalence and viraemia. Blood donor data were compared with results from previous studies covering 2004-08. Notified laboratory-confirmed hepatitis E cases (2009-16) were extracted from national surveillance data. Viraemic samples from blood donors (2016) and chronic hepatitis E transplant patients (2014-16) were sequenced. Results: Anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence varied geographically and was highest in Edinburgh where it increased from 4.5% in 2004-08) to 9.3% in 2014-15 (p = 0.001). It was most marked in donors < 35 years. HEV RNA was found in 1:2,481 donors, compared with 1:14,520 in 2011. Notified laboratory-confirmed cases increased by a factor of 15 between 2011 and 2016, from 13 to 206. In 2011-13, 1 of 329 transplant recipients tested positive for acute HEV, compared with six cases of chronic infection during 2014-16. Of 10 sequenced viraemic donors eight and all six patients were infected with genotype 3 clade 1 virus, common in European pigs. Conclusions: The seroprevalence, number of viraemic donors and numbers of notified laboratory-confirmed cases of HEV in Scotland have all recently increased. The causes of this change are unknown, but need further investigation. Clinicians in Scotland, particularly those caring for immunocompromised patients, should have a low threshold for testing for HEV.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Hepatitis E/virology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , RNA, Viral/blood , Viremia/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Genotype , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis E/blood , Hepatitis E/transmission , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Phylogeny , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Scotland/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Viremia/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(12): 2081-2084, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148368

ABSTRACT

In December 2014, Ebola virus disease (EVD) was diagnosed in a healthcare worker in the United Kingdom after the worker returned from an Ebola treatment center in Sierra Leone. The worker flew on 2 flights during the early stages of disease. Follow-up of 238 contacts showed no evidence of secondary transmission of Ebola virus.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , Disease Outbreaks , Ebolavirus/pathogenicity , Health Personnel , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Adult , Aircraft , Ebolavirus/physiology , Female , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/transmission , Humans , International Cooperation , Sierra Leone/epidemiology , Travel , United Kingdom/epidemiology
19.
Scott Med J ; 62(3): 101-103, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836925

ABSTRACT

In an attempt to explore healthcare worker acquisition of tuberculosis infection, we conducted population-based surveillance of all cases recorded as healthcare workers reported to Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infection from 2000 to 2015. Over the study period, the mean incidence rate of tuberculosis among all healthcare workers was 15.4 per 100,000 healthcare workers. However, the incidence rate of tuberculosis amongst those healthcare workers born outside the UK was 164.8 per 100,000 compared with 5.0 per 100,000 UK-born healthcare workers. Fifty-seven per cent of all non-UK-born healthcare workers were diagnosed within five years of their arrival in the UK and would have been new entrants to the NHS. An effective new entrant occupational health screening programme for latent tuberculosis infection may have prevented some of these active cases of infection.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Mass Screening , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Emigrants and Immigrants , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Incidence , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Primary Health Care , Risk Factors , Scotland
20.
Euro Surveill ; 22(32)2017 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28816651

ABSTRACT

During the summers of 2015 and 2016, the United Kingdom experienced large outbreaks of cyclosporiasis in travellers returning from Mexico. As the source of the outbreaks was not identified, there is the potential for a similar outbreak to occur in 2017; indeed 78 cases had already been reported as at 27 July 2017. Early communication and international collaboration is essential to provide a better understanding of the source and extent of this recurring situation.


Subject(s)
Cyclospora/isolation & purification , Cyclosporiasis/diagnosis , Diarrhea/etiology , Disease Outbreaks , Travel , Adult , Age Distribution , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Disease Notification , Feces , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Population Surveillance , Seasons , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...